Systematic reviews of observational studies of risk of thrombosis and bleeding in urological surgery (ROTBUS): introduction and methodology

نویسندگان

  • Kari AO Tikkinen
  • Arnav Agarwal
  • Samantha Craigie
  • Rufus Cartwright
  • Michael K Gould
  • Jari Haukka
  • Richard Naspro
  • Giacomo Novara
  • Per Morten Sandset
  • Reed A Siemieniuk
  • Philippe D Violette
  • Gordon H Guyatt
چکیده

BACKGROUND Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in the peri-operative period involves a trade-off between reduction in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and an increase in bleeding. Baseline risks, in the absence of prophylaxis, for VTE and bleeding are known to vary widely between urological procedures, but their magnitude is highly uncertain. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing baseline risks are uncommon, needed, and require methodological innovation. In this article, we describe the rationale and methods for a series of systematic reviews of the risks of symptomatic VTE and bleeding requiring reoperation in urological surgery. METHODS/DESIGN We searched MEDLINE from January 1, 2000 until April 10, 2014 for observational studies reporting on symptomatic VTE or bleeding after urological procedures. Additional studies known to experts and studies cited in relevant review articles were added. Teams of two reviewers, independently assessed articles for eligibility, evaluated risk of bias, and abstracted data. We derived best estimates of risk from the median estimates among studies rated at the lowest risk of bias. The primary endpoints were 30-day post-operative risk estimates of symptomatic VTE and bleeding requiring reoperation, stratified by procedure and patient risk factors. DISCUSSION This series of systematic reviews will inform clinicians and patients regarding the trade-off between VTE prevention and bleeding. Our work advances standards in systematic reviews of surgical complications, including assessment of risk of bias, criteria for arriving at best estimates of risk (including modeling of timing of events and dealing with suboptimal data reporting), dealing with subgroups at higher and lower risk of bias, and use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate certainty in estimates of risk. The results will be incorporated in the upcoming European Association Urology Guideline on Thromboprophylaxis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42014010342.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Procedure-specific Risks of Thrombosis and Bleeding in Urological Non-cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

CONTEXT Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis involves a trade-off between a reduction in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and increased bleeding. No guidance specific for procedure and patient factors exists in urology. OBJECTIVE To inform estimates of absolute risk of symptomatic VTE and bleeding requiring reoperation in urological non-cancer surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched for contemp...

متن کامل

Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (CVT) following COVID-19 vaccination: an umbrella review of systematic reviews

Background and Objective: This umbrella review presents comprehensive data on the evidence of the association between cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) and COVID-19 vaccinations. Methods: We searched related databases to access issue-related systematic reviews both with meta‐analyses or without it that studied the connotation between COVID 19 vaccination and CVT in any languages from initiatio...

متن کامل

Acromial Stress Fractures: A Systematic Review

Background: Acromial stress fracture (ASF) is a unique complication of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) thatcan have substantial influence on clinical results. The purpose of this review is to describe demographics, functionaloutcomes, and union rates for cases of RSA complicated by ASF.Methods: A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systemati...

متن کامل

Some Notes on Critical Appraisal of Prevalence Studies; Comment on: “The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews Addressing Questions of Prevalence”

Decisions in healthcare should be based on information obtained according to the principles of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). An increasing number of systematic reviews are published which summarize the results of prevalence studies. Interpretation of the results of these reviews should be accompanied by an appraisal of the methodological quality of the included data and studies. The critical a...

متن کامل

The effect of antipsychotics in the prevention and treatment of delirium in the elderly admitted to intensive care units: a systematic review

    Introduction: The present study reviews published studies on the effects of antipsychotic use in the treatment of delirium in the elderly in order to determine the effect of antipsychotic drugs on the prevention and treatment of delirium in the elderly admitted to the intensive care unit and the possible side effects of these drugs in this group of patients. Method: The present review arti...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014